<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inglorious Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stkarnick.com/culture/index.php/2010/01/27/inglorious-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stkarnick.com/culture/2010/01/27/inglorious-controversy/</link>
	<description>News, reviews, and analysis, edited by S. T. Karnick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goldstein vs Klavan at American Culture</title>
		<link>http://stkarnick.com/culture/2010/01/27/inglorious-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5682</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldstein vs Klavan at American Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stkarnick.com/culture/?p=5307#comment-5682</guid>
		<description>[...] Patrick Goldstein, lefty LA Times movie dude, unloaded on me the other day for my take on Inglorious Basterds (see below).  I responded by having John Nolte go over there and kneecap the guy (you do not want to mess with Nolte).  But there was a smarter and more considered response from S.T. Karnick over at The American Culture. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patrick Goldstein, lefty LA Times movie dude, unloaded on me the other day for my take on Inglorious Basterds (see below).  I responded by having John Nolte go over there and kneecap the guy (you do not want to mess with Nolte).  But there was a smarter and more considered response from S.T. Karnick over at The American Culture. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Crandall</title>
		<link>http://stkarnick.com/culture/2010/01/27/inglorious-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5679</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Crandall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stkarnick.com/culture/?p=5307#comment-5679</guid>
		<description>Goldstein is living in a bubble, and he&#039;s bothered that someone dared disturb it. His comment that Klavan believes Hollywood &quot;is chock-full of leftist dilettantes who disrespect all sorts of important cultural icons&quot; only because Klavan is a &quot;right-winger&quot; falls right in line with the exchange I had with Greg Wright. &quot;Dogmatic Leftists?!? In Hollywood? There are no Leftists here. No, siree. Just a bunch of artists (who reinforce each other&#039;s &quot;progressive&quot; ideology) creatively expressing themselves. Only &quot;right-wingers&quot; think this place is chock-full of leftist dilettantes.&quot; I think terminal obtuseness is required to make it in Hollywood. 
 
Is Tarantino that rare creature, free of any political bones? Well, Tarantino did book a seat at the Democrat National Convention in 2008. &quot;But he went to the Republican convention as well,&quot; some might protest. Being in the same city does not mean he is attending the convention. Tarantino was scheduled to participate in a Creative Coalition fundraising event alongside Spike Lee, Susan Sarandon, and Barry Levinson. Last time I checked those folks were not exactly Republican supporters. Tarantino was also jury president at Canne Film Fest when it gave best picture award to &lt;i&gt;Farhenheit 9/11&lt;/i&gt;. &quot;Oh, but Quentin said he voted for it because it is a quality film. Its message had nothing to do with the award.&quot; Riiiigghht. If you believe that, there&#039;s a bridge over the Tacoma Narrows I&#039;d like to sell you. 
 
Goldstein&#039;s attack against Klavan, by lumping him with conservatives who &quot;either detest pop culture or have such inflexible rules about how it is supposed to be created&quot; shows how ignorant Goldstein is of any view outside the liberal-left world he waddles around in. Klavan detests pop culture or has inflexible rules about how it should be created?!? Has ever bothered to read a single Klavan book? Or was Patrick to busy swallowing everything the LATimes shoveled into his gaping maw? How about Russell Kirk&#039;s ghostly &amp; gothic fiction? Or the speculative work of Gene Wolfe, James P. Blaylock, or John Ringo? 
 
When it comes to &lt;i&gt;Avatar&lt;/i&gt; conservatives critics are simply taking Cameron at his word that he was creating a dogmatically liberal film. Millions of people may be going to see the movie for the 3-D extravaganza, but that doesn&#039;t mean Cameron wasn&#039;t making a political movie. It just means that millions of people are ignoring Cameron&#039;s hamfisted sermonizing on the evils of Western Civilization and are just staring at the big shiny blue box in which he delivered his message. Just as a lot of left-wing critics ignore the Biblical story in DeMille&#039;s &lt;i&gt;The Ten Commandments&lt;/i&gt; and just marvel at the cinematic spectacle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goldstein is living in a bubble, and he&#8217;s bothered that someone dared disturb it. His comment that Klavan believes Hollywood &#8220;is chock-full of leftist dilettantes who disrespect all sorts of important cultural icons&#8221; only because Klavan is a &#8220;right-winger&#8221; falls right in line with the exchange I had with Greg Wright. &#8220;Dogmatic Leftists?!? In Hollywood? There are no Leftists here. No, siree. Just a bunch of artists (who reinforce each other&#8217;s &#8220;progressive&#8221; ideology) creatively expressing themselves. Only &#8220;right-wingers&#8221; think this place is chock-full of leftist dilettantes.&#8221; I think terminal obtuseness is required to make it in Hollywood. </p>
<p>Is Tarantino that rare creature, free of any political bones? Well, Tarantino did book a seat at the Democrat National Convention in 2008. &#8220;But he went to the Republican convention as well,&#8221; some might protest. Being in the same city does not mean he is attending the convention. Tarantino was scheduled to participate in a Creative Coalition fundraising event alongside Spike Lee, Susan Sarandon, and Barry Levinson. Last time I checked those folks were not exactly Republican supporters. Tarantino was also jury president at Canne Film Fest when it gave best picture award to <i>Farhenheit 9/11</i>. &#8220;Oh, but Quentin said he voted for it because it is a quality film. Its message had nothing to do with the award.&#8221; Riiiigghht. If you believe that, there&#8217;s a bridge over the Tacoma Narrows I&#8217;d like to sell you. </p>
<p>Goldstein&#8217;s attack against Klavan, by lumping him with conservatives who &#8220;either detest pop culture or have such inflexible rules about how it is supposed to be created&#8221; shows how ignorant Goldstein is of any view outside the liberal-left world he waddles around in. Klavan detests pop culture or has inflexible rules about how it should be created?!? Has ever bothered to read a single Klavan book? Or was Patrick to busy swallowing everything the LATimes shoveled into his gaping maw? How about Russell Kirk&#8217;s ghostly &amp; gothic fiction? Or the speculative work of Gene Wolfe, James P. Blaylock, or John Ringo? </p>
<p>When it comes to <i>Avatar</i> conservatives critics are simply taking Cameron at his word that he was creating a dogmatically liberal film. Millions of people may be going to see the movie for the 3-D extravaganza, but that doesn&#8217;t mean Cameron wasn&#8217;t making a political movie. It just means that millions of people are ignoring Cameron&#8217;s hamfisted sermonizing on the evils of Western Civilization and are just staring at the big shiny blue box in which he delivered his message. Just as a lot of left-wing critics ignore the Biblical story in DeMille&#8217;s <i>The Ten Commandments</i> and just marvel at the cinematic spectacle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D'Virgilio</title>
		<link>http://stkarnick.com/culture/2010/01/27/inglorious-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D'Virgilio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stkarnick.com/culture/?p=5307#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>The left always comes from a place of self-affirmed moral superiority. Add to that their claim to ultimate objectivity and you have a delusional and dangerous brew. They claim the mantel of tolerance, yet they are just as judgmental as the most impassioned fundamentalist religious believer. This blindness, which they of course deny, afflicts all the cultural influence professions, like Hollywood, education and journalism. They deny bias in all, because by their very own definition they cannot be biased. Goldstein&#039;s slap down of Mr. Klavan is just another obvious example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The left always comes from a place of self-affirmed moral superiority. Add to that their claim to ultimate objectivity and you have a delusional and dangerous brew. They claim the mantel of tolerance, yet they are just as judgmental as the most impassioned fundamentalist religious believer. This blindness, which they of course deny, afflicts all the cultural influence professions, like Hollywood, education and journalism. They deny bias in all, because by their very own definition they cannot be biased. Goldstein&#8217;s slap down of Mr. Klavan is just another obvious example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

