Posts Tagged ‘ progressivism ’

Social Engineering: Progressivism’s Dark Side

September 22, 2011
By
Social Engineering: Progressivism’s Dark Side

The so-called “Progressive Era” of the last century — a time of virtually unlimited governmental intervention in the private lives of America’s citizens conducted by legions of do-gooders imbued with only the best of intentions — has never really gone away, sad to say: According to the received account of the Progressive Era, an enlightened government swept in and regulated markets for goods, labor, and capital, thereby protecting the hapless masses from the vicissitudes of unrestrained laissez-faire capitalism. The Progressives had faith that experts would rise above self-interest and implement wise plans to create a great society. The resulting state-level workplace safety regulations, restrictions on child labor, and minimum wages restored dignity and safety to the trod-upon and exploited workers. Despite the widespread acceptance of this narrative, there are many reasons to question whether it accurately portrays the motivations and hopes of some Progressive-Era reformers. — Art Carden and Steven Horwitz Regardless of all the high-flown rhetoric of the time, furthermore, “lurking behind what many people see as humanitarian reforms was something much uglier” — an intentional war on the “undesirable” and the “unfit.” The implications of Darwinian thinking were enthusiastically implemented in eugenics programs, most of them officially sanctioned

Read more »

The “Blessings” of Technocracy

August 25, 2011
By
The “Blessings” of Technocracy

I’m all for free enterprise and true capitalism, as every right-thinking person should be. The trouble is the social and economic predicament in which we Americans presently find ourselves is both the product of and the continuing vehicle for the preservation of an anti-capitalistic regime which over the past century has gradually gained such a stranglehold on the governmental, economic, and social system as to pose a permanent impediment to free enterprise and an active threat to individual autonomy. The irony is that the regime was, is, and will remain comprised of entities that were once built upon free enterprise and true capitalism. It goes under various names — “corporatism” and “the welfare-warfare state” are two popular terms — but its patrimony is unmistakable, being the lineal descendant of the Progressivist programs of the early 20th century, with all of Progressivism’s technocratic zeal intact and active. It would probably surprise some people in government — those who, for instance, propose labyrinthine laws without reading them or fabricating non-existent, “shovel-ready” jobs — to be characterized as “technocrats” (the term sounds so unfeeling, doesn’t it?), but exponents of technocracy they are. The bitter, rotting fruits of Progressivism now litter the ground around

Read more »

The Authoritarian Crime Drama ‘Law and Order: Criminal Intent’

June 27, 2011
By
The Authoritarian Crime Drama ‘Law and Order: Criminal Intent’

I suppose that I am somewhat unusual in never having liked the lead characters of Law and Order: Criminal Intent, nor thought the performances of Vincent D’Onofrio and Kathryn Erbe particularly appealing or praiseworthy. D’Onofrio, of course, was known for his excessively exaggerated performing style in his portrayal of the show’s lead character, Detective Bobby Goren, and I thought that Kathryn Erbe did a good but unimpressive job of depicting an essentially unappealing and uninteresting character in lead detective Alex Eames. Both characters annoyed me in essence, I suspect, because they were such perfect specimens of a particularly common and grating type of contemporary American: the Priggish Urban Liberal-Progressive Busybody Knowitall Pseudointellectual Snob. And in doing so, the show conveyed a point of view based on authoritarianism, exemplifying the contemporary worldview that the political writer Jonah Goldberg calls liberal fascism. I imagine that the unappealing character type at the center of Law and Order: Criminal Intent hardly requires any further description for most readers, as it thoroughly infests current-day TV news and talk shows, newspaper columns, Slate and the Huffington Post and other fashionable politico-cultural websites, contemporary art shows, your neighborhood Starbucks, and other such locales made repellant by their

Read more »

Quote of the Day: Jack Cashill on “Progressives”

June 12, 2011
By
Quote of the Day: Jack Cashill on “Progressives”

* Progressives do not set out to do evil. They set out to do good. * They do their good in a world in which God is irrelevant, and “everything is permitted.” * With God out of the picture, they are free to do good by their own lights, better than it has ever been done before. * The “good” they devise quickly calcifies into orthodoxy. * Lesser mortals who fail to heed the new dogma risk reeducation. * Reeducation can be brutal. An “over-sensibility for ourselves and an over-indulgence to our own desires,” said Burke shrewdly, lead to the “greatest crimes.” * Once committed to those desires, progressives don’t look back. The dead, the damaged, and the aborted are ignored or quickly forgotten. * Unwilling to undo or even question, they respond to disaster with sad and superficial correctives like mosquito nets or condoms or more “education.” * Unbound by God, progressives are thus also unbound by any traditions that claim divine inspiration. * To the degree that those traditions threaten their progress, progressives are hostile to those traditions, specifically Judeo-Christianity and its twin towers of resolve, America and Israel. In the worldwide culture war, our progressive friends honor

Read more »

Is Glenn Beck Right About the Progressives?

September 16, 2010
By
Is Glenn Beck Right About the Progressives?

by Mike Gray . . . at a time when there is a serious debate about first principles—and when significant elements of the public appear receptive to criticisms of our march toward European-style social democracy—the meaning of progressivism, past and present, is surely relevant. — Ronald J. Pestritto Hillsdale College professor Pestritto literally wrote the book on one of the icons of the progressive movement (Woodrow Wilson and the Roots of Modern Liberalism, 2005), so what he has to say is of some import: Whatever I or anyone else thinks about Mr. Beck’s programming or political views, on one central historical issue he is correct: The progressive movement did indeed repudiate the principles of individual liberty and limited government that were the basis of the American republic. America’s original progressives were convinced that the country faced a set of social and economic problems demanding a sharp increase in federal power. They also said that there was too much emphasis placed on protecting the liberty of individuals at the expense of broader social justice. For progressives, it’s the heart and not the head that rules: To achieve their ends, progressives understood that the original constitutional limits on the scope of the

Read more »

Was Woodrow Wilson a Racist? And Does It Matter Now?

September 11, 2010
By
Was Woodrow Wilson a Racist? And Does It Matter Now?

by Mike Gray Wilson gave the finest sermon for what humans are capable of if they are not human. — George Clemenceau Woodrow Wilson’s brand of oblique racism—publicly professing one viewpoint while pushing policies that affirm its opposite—has been the modus operandi of most “progressives” for nearly a century. At Accuracy in Academia, Malcolm A. Kline has written about Wilson’s hypocritical stance on segregation: Few presidents are as revered as Woodrow Wilson in academia. He was, after all, the last academic elected to America’s highest office. Beyond that, much ink is spilled and many lectures devoted to his policies which many professors are enamored of, chiefly the progressive income tax at home and the League of Nations abroad … we should highlight a Wilsonian trend in policy that is relevant to both his national and international outlook—segregation. A kinder, gentler racism would almost inevitably be part of any “progressivist” program, or what Jonah Goldberg has called “liberal fascism”: The side of fascism attributes to American liberalism is not that associated with the works of George Orwell or the racism and genocide of the Holocaust. It is much less brutal, “smiley-face fascism,” as he puts it. He asserts that

Read more »

A New Pretext for Big Government: ‘Food Deserts’

August 8, 2010
By
A New Pretext for Big Government: ‘Food Deserts’

By Mike Gray Until three days ago, I’d never heard of ‘food deserts’; their first mention—for me—was on a local TV station news report concerning how much and where tax revenues should be spent on what is euphemistically called ‘community development.’ An article on Wikipedia tells us A food desert is a district with little or no access to foods needed to maintain a healthy diet but often served by plenty of fast food restaurants. Without defining ‘a healthy diet,’ the article goes on: The concept of ‘access’ may be interpreted in three ways. ‘Physical access’ to shops can be difficult if the shops are distant, the shopper is elderly or infirm, the area has many hills, public transport links are poor, and the consumer has no car. Also, the shop maybe across a busy road, difficult to cross with children or with underpasses that some fear to use because of a crime risk. For some, such as disabled people, the inside of the shop may be hard to access physically if there are steps up or the interior is cramped with no room for walking aids. Carrying fresh food home may also be hard for some. Thanks to criminals,

Read more »

Stephen King Strikes Out with ‘Blockade Billy’

July 3, 2010
By
Stephen King Strikes Out with ‘Blockade Billy’

Baseball inspires great stories. W. P. Kinsella’s Shoeless Joe and Bernard Malamud’s The Natural are two fine examples that mix nostalgia for the game with a moving tale. Stephen King mixed nostalgia and his obvious love for baseball with the genre for which he’s famous in Blockade Billy. It is about as far from a home run as King has ever been. In Blockade Billy, it’s 1957 and things aren’t going so well for the New Jersey Titans. Their starting catcher is caught in a hit and run of the drunk driving, rather than the baseball, variety, ending his career. Their backup catcher has a physique that makes a scarecrow look hefty. A massive collision at the plate during preseason sends him packing with a couple of broken limbs and a concussion. Desperate for a catcher, the Titans call up William Blakely from the minor leagues. After several amazing stops at the plate, fans dub William ‘Blockade Billy’. The first such incident ends a pinch-runner’s career. He went up and over and landed behind the lefthand batter’s box. The umpire lifted his fist in the out sign. Then Anderson started to yell and grab his ankle.… Anderson’s left pants cuff

Read more »

Is There a Culture War, or What?

May 13, 2010
By
Is There a Culture War, or What?

There is a culture war, and we need it, argues Carol Iannone on NRO’s The Corner. I don’t like martial metaphors, but I strongly agree with Carol Iannone that there are basically two worldviews competing irreconcilably in the United States today. One, called progressivism, derives from the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and tends to blame all human problems on imperfect social institutions. Individuals devoted to this worldview concentrate great effort on the perfecting of institutions according to their idea of social justice, which evolves as new problems are created by their efforts to transform society and its institutions. Their opponents refer to this fundamental problem of progressivism as the Law of Unintended Consequences. In addition, progressives of all stripes require the development of an aristocracy consisting of political, economic, social, and cultural elites who can implement the proper management of society. The other worldview, best described as classical liberalism, acknowledges that social conditions circumscribe individuals’ choices, but they nonetheless argue that people have freedom of choice within the conditions under which they live. Such classical liberals argue for political liberty and allowance of social mobility, an essential element of which is the acceptance of the concept of personal responsibility, the

Read more »

‘Criminal Minds’ Episode Borders on Contemptible

April 15, 2010
By
‘Criminal Minds’ Episode Borders on Contemptible

Last Wednesday’s installment of Criminal Minds, “A Right of Passage,” is a perfect example of Hollywood’s unending infatuation with liberal-progressive causes strained through a politically correct filter and served up just in time for the present administration’s anticipated new push for amnesty for illegal aliens. A series of decapitations along the volatile border with Marxico prompts the Behavioral Analysis Unit to board their cool Gulfstream execujet and chase after this malefactor. Santa Muerte (The Saint of Death), a legendary figure among the locals, is reputed to be responsible, but our invariably secular FBI agents know better. Somebody’s killing members of a politically privileged ethnic group, and even at Mach 0.9 our heroes can’t get there fast enough. Considering how chaotic the southern U.S. border is reported to be, the occasional murder should come as no surprise. But if it isn’t Santa Muerte, then who could it be? Senior Agent David Rossi (Joe Mantegna) opines that it probably isn’t the Minutemen because that would be bad PR for them. Thanks for that insightful analysis, Agent Rossi: The Minutemen are constrained from murdering each and every illegal alien solely because it wouldn’t look good on the six o’clock news—patriotism, humanitarian impulses, Christian charity, and

Read more »

Surprise: Daily Kos Poll Identifies Republicans As Extremists

February 21, 2010
By
Surprise: Daily Kos Poll Identifies Republicans As Extremists

Before I comment on the results of the poll, one question: Where are the polls that show the extremism of self-identified Democrats, liberals, or progressives? Why is it that the word “extreme” applies onlyto views on the right? Certainly we can chalk this up to media bias, and all the rest of the predictable conservative complaints, but part of it is that conservatives generally never refer to liberal/left policies and views as “extreme.” Maybe that’s a tribute to the fundamental decency of most conservatives and their worldview, but more likely it’s a function of the right having played defense to what the left claims is their moral superiority for over 100 years. More on this in a moment. The survey by Research 2000 of 1,000 self-identified Republicans found the following: 21 percent believe the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) stole the 2008 election and 55 percent aren’t sure. 31 percent believe Obama is a racist who hates white people and 33 percent aren’t sure. 23 percent want their state to secede from the U.S. and 19 percent aren’t sure. Only 26 percent favor letting openly gay Americans serve in the military. 67 percent believe the only way

Read more »

The Toxic Philosophy Behind ‘Quirky’ Film(s)

July 2, 2009
By
The Toxic Philosophy Behind ‘Quirky’ Film(s)

          Charming, quirky films such as Away We Go aren’t always as innocent as they seem, S. T. Karnick writes.

Read more »


"Culture is the expression of the guiding philosophy of the day."—Murray Rothbard

Subscribe to The American Culture.

 

February 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829  

Archive

Twitter Feed!

Follow the American Culture and S. T. Karnick on Twitter! Send message "follow stkarnick1" to 40404 on your cell phone or go to twitter.com.

Packages Seo